Army Leadership Crisis Deepens as Hegseth's Firings Leave Iowa's General Out, Top Post Vacant
The US Army is operating without a permanent chief of staff amid a wave of dismissals by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a leadership vacuum that comes as American forces face intensifying missile and drone threats in the Middle East. The turmoil has direct ties to Iowa, with Republican Senator Joni Ernst playing a key role in blocking the nomination of the acting chief.
The Army has been without its top officer since Hegseth fired General Randy George in April without explanation. George, an Iowan, was expected to serve through mid-2027. At least three senior officers considered possible successors have also been forced out, according to officials cited by the New York Times.
What's behind the Army's leadership shakeup?
Hegseth arrived at the Pentagon with deep mistrust of the Army's senior leadership. In his 2024 book, he wrote:
“The military I loved, I fought for, I revered, spit me out.”
That tension has defined his tenure. Beyond George, Hegseth has fired or forced out roughly half a dozen senior officers, thinning the ranks of experienced leaders at the top of the Army. The service now has five four-star generals, down from 10 in January 2025.
How is Iowa Senator Joni Ernst involved?
Senator Ernst has emerged as a key obstacle to confirming General Christopher LaNeve, Hegseth's pick for chief of staff. Ernst believed Hegseth would allow George, a fellow Iowan, to complete his term. After George was dismissed, Ernst called President Donald Trump to complain. Trump told her the decision had been Hegseth's.
“Tell the general I'm sorry,” Trump said.
Ernst's objections, along with holds from other lawmakers, have left LaNeve without enough Republican support in the Senate for confirmation. He currently serves as both vice chief of staff and acting chief.
What's at stake for the Army's readiness?
The leadership gap comes during the Army's busiest period since the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Army air-defense units are protecting troops from increasingly sophisticated Iranian missile attacks, while European command provides intelligence and support to Ukraine.
An Iranian missile struck prefabricated housing at a US base in Jordan on July 17, killing three American soldiers and injuring more than 100. Iran has also launched waves of Shahed drones against US forces, including an attack on a base in Kuwait that killed six soldiers.
Critics warn the leadership vacuum could leave the Army struggling to keep pace with Russia and China, both advancing the use of artificial intelligence and drones on the battlefield.
Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll expected to depart
Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll, the service's top civilian official, is also expected to leave the administration in the coming months. He has already moved out of the family home he rented at Fort Myer near Washington. Driscoll is barely on speaking terms with Hegseth, according to officials, and is expected to step down by the end of the year.
Driscoll and George had worked together on preparing the Army for a battlefield increasingly dominated by drones. The White House had also asked Driscoll late last year to help with efforts to secure a peace deal in Ukraine, though those efforts have largely stalled.
What are critics saying about the firings?
Representative Pat Ryan, a New York Democrat and former Army intelligence officer, warned the dismissals could weaken the military's nonpartisan character.
“Hollowing out the most battle-tested and most lethal, proven leaders in a time of war means troops are less safe and we're less likely to win,” Ryan told the New York Times. “We're doing generational damage to the sense that the military is an apolitical trusted organization that swears an oath to the Constitution, not to a president.”
The Army defended its leadership in a statement.
“Army leaders exemplify the highest standards of duty, selflessness, and professional excellence,” said Cynthia O. Smith, an Army spokeswoman. “They are actively driving the Army's mission forward, ensuring that our strategic objectives are met, our modernization efforts remain on track and our global readiness is never compromised.”
What happens next for the Army's top post?
For now, LaNeve continues to serve in both roles. The Army's Transformation and Training Command, which oversees training and equipment of ground forces including Patriot missile crews, also lacks a permanent leader after Hegseth fired General David M. Hodne eight months into the role.
In July, Hegseth reduced General Christopher T. Donahue's command overseeing US ground troops in Europe from a four-star to a three-star position, potentially forcing him into retirement.
The ongoing vacancies raise serious questions about the Army's readiness and strategic objectives as it confronts global threats and modernization challenges. With no permanent chief in sight and key leaders departing, the service faces an uncertain path forward.