Conservatives Blast Trump's Iran Deal Concessions
President Trump's newly announced memorandum of understanding with Iran is facing fierce pushback from conservative lawmakers and commentators. The preliminary deal reopens the Strait of Hormuz but allows Iran to sell oil free of U.S. sanctions and creates a $300 billion reconstruction fund, drawing criticism that Tehran got the better end of the bargain. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve held interest rates steady as energy inflation squeezes family budgets, and an Iowa congressman's failed gubernatorial bid highlights a national trend of voters rejecting Washington experience.
What is in the Iran peace deal?
Trump administration officials on Wednesday read out the text of a 14-point memorandum of understanding with Iran, signed electronically earlier this week and finalized by Trump during dinner with French President Emmanuel Macron at Versailles.
The preliminary agreement reopens the Strait of Hormuz and keeps the critical waterway toll-free throughout a 60-day negotiation period. However, several provisions have triggered intense backlash from Republicans. The MOU allows Iran to immediately begin selling oil free of U.S. sanctions and proposes a $300 billion fund for Iran's reconstruction as part of a final nuclear deal.
While the deal reaffirms Iran's longstanding commitment not to pursue a nuclear weapon, it lacks specific commitments to stop nuclear enrichment or hand over weapons-grade uranium stockpiles. Trump also defended letting Iran maintain its large arsenal of ballistic missiles, telling reporters at a G7 press conference that they have to have some because other countries do.
Why are Republican senators criticizing the Iran agreement?
A handful of Republican senators defended the deal, but the overwhelming sentiment among conservatives in Congress and the media was that Iran came out on top.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who recently lost his primary to a Trump-backed challenger, said former President Ronald Reagan is rolling over in his grave at the MOU. He expressed deep concern that Iran would threaten access to the Strait of Hormuz in the future.
Before the war, the strait was open, Iran was being crushed by sanctions, and 13 service members were still alive. Now, 13 Americans are dead, families have paid billions at the pump, sanctions will be lifted, and the bombing has stopped. This is the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, raised concerns about the deal granting major concessions to the rogue state, telling reporters he thinks the president is receiving some very poor advice on this deal. Cruz added that history teaches giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea.
Commentator Ben Shapiro said the deal appears to be a disaster that fails to achieve the administration's goals. Shapiro pointed the finger directly at Vice President Vance, arguing the chief negotiator has not well served the president.
Not all conservatives were entirely opposed. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., urged caution on Fox News, noting the president just said there is nothing final. Hawley praised Trump for getting the Strait reopened and burying their nuclear program as big achievements.
Trump himself pushed back on the criticism, stressing the importance of reopening the Strait of Hormuz. He warned that oil reserves would run out in about four weeks otherwise, causing economic bedlam. The president also left the door open to resuming strikes, warning that if he does not like how the MOU progresses, the U.S. will go back to shooting at them.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a fierce Iran hawk and loyal Trump ally, initially raised concerns but shifted his posture after a lengthy discussion with Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff. Graham wrote on social media that he sees little downside to trying, noting the Strait of Hormuz will begin to open and hostilities will stop. Vice President Vance quickly celebrated the shift, stating the president's coalition is uniting behind his leadership.
Why did the Federal Reserve hold interest rates steady?
The Federal Reserve voted to keep interest rates at their current level Wednesday in new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first rate-setting meeting. The Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to hold rates steady at a range of 3.5 to 3.75 percent.
The decision was widely expected after inflation reached a three-year high last month, driven largely by the Iran war escalating the price of energy and other products. For Iowa families and farmers, the hold means borrowing costs for homes, equipment, and land remain elevated.
Eight members of the committee signaled they expect the Fed to hold rates steady for the rest of the year, while nine anticipated varying levels of rate hikes. Only one member indicated a quarter-point rate cut was possible. Although Trump had previously pushed for lower rates, he brushed off the decision, saying Warsh is a very good guy and he is guided by what he wants.
How does the SAVE Act impact FISA renewal?
Efforts to restore the federal government's warrantless surveillance powers took a major hit after Trump canceled the hearing for his nominee to become the next director of national intelligence. Jay Clayton, a former Securities and Exchange Commission head, was scheduled to appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday.
Trump delayed the confirmation process, accusing Democrats of breaking a deal to renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The president is insisting the Senate confirm Clayton's replacement as U.S. attorney first. More importantly for election integrity advocates, Trump is demanding Congress add the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, a major voting requirements bill, to the FISA extension.
Section 702 has been expired for nearly a week after Congress failed to reach a deal. The provision allows the government to conduct intelligence-gathering on foreigners abroad without a warrant. Frustration among Senate Republicans is growing as the president holds firm on tying election security to surveillance powers.
Are voters rejecting Washington experience?
Members of Congress who have launched bids for higher office this year have had a lower success rate than in recent years, raising questions about how much voters still value Washington experience.
Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, suffered a significant gubernatorial primary loss in Iowa, marking Trump's first major statewide primary loss of the cycle after endorsing Feenstra. Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., another failed gubernatorial candidate, argued that primary voters are not excited to reward members with a different job.
Serving in the House is not viewed as a particularly big asset, and primary voters don't seem to be excited to reward members with a different job.
Overall, 29 House members have launched bids for higher office this cycle. Eleven have lost, seven have won, and 11 more face primaries later this summer.
What does the Iran MOU mean for U.S. sanctions?
The memorandum of understanding allows Iran to immediately begin selling oil free of U.S. sanctions during the 60-day negotiation period, a major shift from the maximum pressure campaign that previously crippled Tehran's economy.
How does the Iran deal affect gas prices?
President Trump argued that reopening the Strait of Hormuz is crucial to preventing economic bedlam, as oil reserves would run out in four weeks otherwise. However, critics point out that lifting sanctions on Iranian oil empowers a hostile regime even as American families have already paid billions at the pump due to the conflict.
Why is the SAVE Act tied to FISA renewal?
President Trump is demanding that Congress attach the SAVE Act, which strengthens voter eligibility requirements, to any extension of FISA. Trump canceled the hearing for his intelligence director nominee to force Democrats to honor what he calls a broken deal on both issues.