Senate Candidates Dodge Debates, Denying Voters Accountability
Across the country, Senate candidates are refusing to agree to debates, denying voters the chance to see where they stand on the issues that matter most. General election debates have been confirmed in just two competitive Senate races this cycle, Arizona and Colorado, according to a recent survey of campaigns.
The reluctance crosses party lines, but the message to voters is the same: we would rather control our own narratives than answer tough questions on live television.
Fetterman Ducks Debates, Raises Serious Questions
Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, the Democratic Senate nominee, has drawn heavy criticism for avoiding debates with his Republican opponent, Dr. Mehmet Oz. Fetterman suffered a stroke in May and has largely avoided open forums since, citing hearing difficulties.
Oz, joined by retiring GOP Sen. Pat Toomey, held a press conference Tuesday to call out Fetterman's avoidance.
What happens if a U.S. senator in an important state like Pennsylvania is elected never having answered a legitimate question from a voter, from a newscaster in a non-taped setting, in a debate stage?
Fetterman told reporters Thursday he would commit to one debate, but has yet to propose a specific venue or date. For many voters, that is not enough.
Republican Challengers Demand Accountability
In Washington state, Republican Tiffany Smiley has publicly announced every debate invitation she has accepted, while Democratic Sen. Patty Murray has so far declined to commit. Smiley has also criticized Murray for refusing to participate in a joint newspaper editorial board interview.
A Murray spokesperson said the senator